Do You Know Diabetes? Quiz by NovoNordisk benefits Diabetes Hands Foundation

Do You Know Diabetes is a joint effort between Novo Nordisk and the Diabetes Hands Foundation to provide education and raise awareness about diabetes.


The cornerstone of the partnership is the “Do You Know Diabetes” quiz, which tests your knowledge of diabetes facts and statistics in a fun, engaging way. The quiz is 10 questions, only takes 5 minutes, and you may be surprised to find some things you don't know, event if you have diabetes!

When you take the quiz, Novo Nordisk will make a donation to the Diabetes Hands Foundation, to aid in their efforts to connect people touched by diabetes and raise awareness of this chronic disease. In the U.S., 26 million people have diabetes, and that number is growing each year. Despite this increase in prevalence, education and awareness of the disease is lagging. We have our job cut out for us!

Please take the quiz today and share it with your friends and family.

80%, not very well!

I took it; however it would be nice if everything on this quiz were accurate! "Type 1 = total lack of insulin" - not true, many Type 1's still have some residual insulin production. "Type 1 accounts for 5-10% of all diabetics". Actually even the long held belief was 10%, not 5-10. But it has been determined that 10-25% of "Type 2's" have been misdiagnosed and are actually Type 1's. This raises the type 1 numbers significantly.

I got 80%, too. Darn statistics!

Sounds like good feedback for the makers of the quiz, Zoe! If you go to http://novonordisk.com/ and scroll to the bottom there are some feedback links :)

I took the quiz, did you?

Will do, Emily, thanks!

I got 70% that's worse.

I got 70% also. Hmmm.

We are obviously not D enough Trudy !

Well, with my seasonal rising needs for insulin, I sure do feel very, very D!

Great to know, Spring! Thanks for the feedback :)

i am a diabetes master. lucky me, haha!

Happy to report ...I took the quiz ...I erred , got 80 percent ...good excuse ...I don't know all the US stats ...can I get away with this ??
PS NovoNordisk is also supporting the CDA .Visit www.whatacuremeans2me.com to register, and then post a story from October 10 to November 30, 2012, to be eligible to win a dream vacation or other exciting prizes. Family, friends and colleagues can show their support by sharing posted stories with their online communities and by making a donation. "What a Cure Means to Me" participants can also host their own local fundraising events. "During the campaign, we will be providing Canadians with the online tools they need to tap into their social communities on Facebook and Twitter, and by e-mail. The more awareness and funds we can generate, the more people we can help," Cloutier adds.

Michael Cloutier is CEO/Pres of CDA ( he runs marathons with Team Diabetes :) )

Here is my response ; I changed from 10 best reasons to one sentence https://apps.facebook.com/whatacuremeans/loadpage/557658948

I can't vote, but YOU can :)

80%!

Missed the one on how many PWDs there will be in 2030 and also where D stands as a leading cause of death. But, my rationalizations are as follows:

1 - Surely by 2030 D will be cured since we ALL know there will be a cure in 5 years, right?

2 - I am focused on LIFE with diabetes, NOT death! So, I tray and stay on the positive side.

Cheers!

Great project! Although question 3 bothered me. Diabetes mostly affects... is a very open ended question, in my opinion. Yes, type 2 is most often diagnosed in middle age, but just using that answer discounts a lot of other statistics about current numbers, type 1's etc. Still, I love Novo (disclaimer, I did work with them for a long time on previous initiatives), and it's great to raise general awareness!

"It's great to raise general awareness"....or it would be if their information was all correct! See my comments about the errors at the top of this thread.

Does LADA have a different diagnosis code than "regular" Type 1? That's probably the source of the statistic and may make any inquiries along that line problematic?

No, I don't believe so, AR. The source of the incorrect statistic is that it is what has been used for many years - 10% Type 1 and 90% Type 2 and very few people have revised their thinking to accommodate the realization of the number of Type 1's who are diagnosed as Type 2's. The same as they still think of Type 1 as "juvenile" and Type 2 as "middle age or older" My figures come from Using Insulin by John Walsh which was published in 2003 (and people like Melitta can probably quote revised stats a lot earlier than that.) I'm sorry but I get very frustrated when I see well established sources presenting incorrect information which will continue to perpetuate more misdiagnosis!