A side note to this discussion…
The rate at which a person burns calories depends on many things - the size of the person, the type of activity, the person’s metabolism, their fitness economy, the intensity of the activity, etc.
Running, swimming, and cycling are all a little different. But for the sake of the point I am making here, we can just say they are all “close enough”.
The amount of blood a person has and the amount of liver glycogen a person has also depends on a few things, mostly the size of a person. But just assuming some easy numbers that are roughly average… an average person might have about 4 grams of glucose in their blood, about 100 grams of glucose stored in their liver, and about 500 grams of glycogen in all of their muscles.
Again, this depends on many things, but here is just a general ballpark average to give context of it all (“hard” for some people is not necessarily as hard for others).
If we are only talking about using a single fuel source, and talking about an average sized person running hard:
-
They would burn through their blood glucose in about a minute!
-
Using only their liver glycogen, they could go 25 minutes.
-
And using only the muscle glycogen in their legs, they have about 1 hour.
When you slow down and start using fat, you increase the time greatly. And if you slow down a lot and start using almost entirely fat, you can pretty much go forever (until sleep and muscle exhaustion and dehydration take over).
I wanted to add this to the discussion to illustrate how insignificant the sugar we have in our blood is, compared to everything else!
Our liver is constantly providing fuel to our blood. And our liver is constantly storing fuel and creating fuel.
BTW, muscle glycogen can never raise blood sugar! Once glucose is stored in the muscles as glycogen, it can only be used by those muscles. It can never be used to raise our BG, and it is never shared with other muscles.