First-Ever ADA Guidance Specifically for Type 1 Diabetes

This type of assessment for planning treatment demonstrates exactly what is wrong with most much of a today’s generisized approach to treatment for T1D’s. This is exactly what the new ADA guidance is trying to tell the medical profession to STOP.

If a medical professional used this tool to make a judgement about my treatment it would be a clear flag for me to go somewhere else.

Granted, I have US private insurance, but, if I followed this approach to making treatment decisions, instead of evaluating all the options, fact, past history, current medicines, and treatment option, I would have not been able to reach 43 years as a T1D with late teen onset. I have, in those years, told more than a few “medical experts” to take their recommendation, or treatment decision, and sovereign it! On more than one occasion this has happened in an OR, or an emergency.

Using words like brittle, narrow classification based decisions, and/or incomplete assessment of a T1D and their unique needs and treatment options, is where we have been. This approach has killed or caused undue health or mental issues to way to many T1Ds in tye part and I hope the ADA guidelines will change this.

I like to share these stats with my Canadian friend BJ Clancy besides the policy makers ...such as my MLA .." Member of the Legislative Assembly " ( friend BJ and TuD member from the petition for pumps over age 25 ) ; she was diagnosed at age 9 and I had shared with her that I had read ( on TuD ) that more type 1's are diagnosed in adulthood compared to kids ... I thank you and am grateful for what you and Cora provided ...I will ask for more studies , if needed !