I met with the hospital dietician and the endocrinologist on Friday. The two could not be more different!
The dietician discussed my diagnosis with me. I told her that I'd been on a low-carb diet for two months, and that my A1c was initially 13.1% but, after 40 days, had dropped to 8.8%. While I'm concerned that my post-meal BG takes hours to return to normal levels, it has dropped significantly in general. I think these are positive points. She didn't agree. While she would admit that what she called an “Atkins” diet does produce results, she believes that they're only short-term and no one can continue to live on the diet. She predicts that I will become tired of not eating bread, cake and sugary foods and that I will stop following the diet and go on a long, long binge. She said that the level of protein and fat in the Atkins diet inevitably leads to poor health.
I don't tolerate gluten at all well and haven't eaten much of it for years. The dietician informed me that it was unwise to eliminate gluten from my diet without a biopsy that confirmed that I have celiac disease. If I don't have it, but am simply sensitive, there are ways to “work with that” diagnosis. She wanted me to ask my family doctor to order the test. I can't see why I should have an invasive test when eliminating the things I'm sensitive to works beautifully. Many people with celiac have far more unpleasant symptoms than I do–and my heart goes out to them. She pointed out that a lot of gluten is hidden in the ingredients used in commercially prepared food. I agree. However, I don't buy or eat such things. I cook what we eat, myself, from scratch. I know the ingredients that go into everything I serve. It's possible that there are trace amounts of gluten in some food, occasionally, if only from contact with things like crumbs from homemade bread, but I have never needed to be that meticulous about avoiding them.
We also disagreed about the amount of protein I'm eating. She thinks I should cut it back, drastically. I think I need to eat more of it, particularly once we figure out how to keep my BG from spiking alarmingly after meals and while I exercise. I know I'm not eating enough protein to help repair muscle tissue at the moment and I would like to get into some weight resistance training.
Ultimately, she challenged me to eat the Diabetes Association diet–high carb, low fat, lower protein–for at least four to six months. Even if I feel good with the diet I'm following now, she's sure I would feel even better on the “correct” diet. She wanted me to agree to eat 30-45 grams of carbohydrate at every meal, and about another 15 g. in an afternoon snack. I didn't agree. I would be the size of a barn in six months, and I said so. For me, at least, the high-carb diet will raise my BG dramatically. The dietician agreed that it would, but she predicted it would only do so for “a few months.” After that, it would “settle down,” she said, and if it didn't, there was medication that would help.
I asked her if she realized what she'd just said. That she wanted me to change my diet from one that is obviously working very well for me to one that she knows won't work well at all for months, if ever; she knows it will be bad for my health for awhile, but I should also be ready to take drugs to lower my BG. I don't need those drugs right now. My health will not benefit. I would lose the successes I've achieved so far, and, in the end, I would end up paying a drug company. This makes no sense.
I told her that I could point to many long-term studies of the benefits of low-carb diets for people with diabetics and that I'm confident that this will continue to work for me.
The dietician also said I need to come to terms with the “fact” that “nearly all diabetics also have heart disease,” and that low-carb diets contribute to coronary problems. Well, in fact, that's not true, either. I've read several good studies. I have no indications of heart disease and nothing pointed to being diabetic before September this year. Before then, my A1c and my lipids were all normal.
It wasn't exactly an argument. It was a very civilized, polite discussion. I don't plan to see her again.
In my next post, I'll describe the meeting with the endocrinologist.