Continuing the discussion from Institutional ignorance can kill us:
@MM1’s reference to the hospitalist’s role in the linked thread prompted me to do some quick googling about what a hospitalist does and how they might influence my ability to manage my own insulin dosing, if capable, while in the hospital.
I learned that the hospitalist is a relatively new profession, only on the scene since about 1996. They are your primary care doctor while you’re in the hospital. If you’re in the hospital for a gall bladder removal, your GI specialist needn’t be concerned with non-GI issues. This makes me wonder if it’s the hospitalist who plays the key role in the typical hospital as to whether I’m allowed to manage my insulin dosing.
Here’s one description of the hospitalist’s role that I found in a registered nurse forum:
17 Articles; 4,168 Posts
Oct 17, 2010
The idea behind the hospitalist is that they can coordinate a person’s inpatient needs better than an attending MD. Yes, the primary care doc knows the patient’s history, but many people have more than one doc, and covering all their needs can become complicated.
For example, if someone goes in for a gall bladder surgery, they may need their cardiac and diabetes meds while they’re inpatient along with any other home meds they take. Their primary doc will not be the one admitting them. The surgeon will. So who orders all the stuff not related to the surgery? The hospitalist. Who will come to see the patient for anything not pertaining to the GI situation? The hospitalist.
The hospitalist team is generally available 24/7. They can call any of the patient’s docs if a consult is needed. And they’ll get through more easily and have their calls returned quicker than the patient would.
Many specialists tend to have tunnel vision for their area. A hospitalist is supposed to be looking at the big picture and providing coverage for the whole person, not just the area of concern at the moment.
I have a relative who periodically goes in for complex ortho or neuro-surgery. Do you think the orthopod or the neurosurgeon wants to order his laxitives and his asthma meds? They will if need be, but they will only order what he’s already on. If something new crops up during his stay, they just want to refer to someone else. The hospitalists now cover the situation, and it’s a whole lot easier to get things accomplished.
Someone else in my family also had surgery a while back for a broken ankle. The surgeons did not want to be responsible for ordering diabetic meds and were actually going to send this person home a day early because they didn’t want to prescribe the wrong things. The hospitalist saved the day and took care of both patient and docs.
In my experience, hospitalists are a great innovation that can spare the docs some headaches and get patients what they need in a timely manner. They also know their way around the hospital and can make things happen in a way a typical attending can’t usually do.
Edited Oct 18, 2010 by rn/writer
I’m thinking that the role of hospitalist, being a relatively new profession, might be more open to partnering with certain diabetes patients to allow them to continue insulin management, if capable. Since the hospitalist profession is relatively new, that likely means that it is staffed by younger and perhaps more flexible doctors open to the idea that a diabetic may be the most experienced and best person to make insulin decisions.
In the linked thread, it was @cardamom who identified the attending physician as the key player in the patient/hospital interaction with deciding who best to manage insulin in the hospital. Perhaps it is the hospitalist who might be our natural ally to safeguard our ability to make insulin decisions, when capable. I wonder what s/he, and others, think about the dynamics of the hospitalist in this scenario?