1st A1C since starting on TandemX2 CIQ

Just a reminder that Control-IQ 's behavior is pretty much entirely controlled by your settings. There are absolutely valid criticisms of the system (“I don’t like the 110 target”, “I don’t like the locked 5 hour DIA”, “It only gives 60% of a correction”, “it doesn’t give corrections often enough”, etc…), but if you feel like it’s ineffective at doing what it’s programmed to do, then that comes down to settings.

Correction factor is the aggressiveness control, and it works on both ends of the spectrum. It controls how much power the pump has to alter both highs and lows. If your CF is set to too high of a number, i.e. less aggressive, then the system is less capable of withholding insulin when a low is predicted. It thinks that it only needs to withhold a smaller amount than is actually true. Too high of a number here incapacitates the system, so it can’t effectively prevent lows. Too low of a CF number of i.e. over-aggressive, can also cause lows by over-correcting highs. You would recognize that pattern by really fast changes, such as highs plummeting into lows, which then rebound into highs again. You’re really looking for that sweet spot in the middle.

There’s no guarantee that CF is the problem, though. A basal rate that is set too high can hide insulin on board from both you and Control-IQ. It can’t properly foresee how much power IOB has to drop your BG in this case, so doesn’t know to suspend. If there is no insulin on board and the system has reduced your basal, then it expects your BG to turn around at any moment, but it doesn’t have correct information to know better. That’s why basal testing is so important. Good basal rates are the foundation of Control-IQ (and the DIY algorithms, too), and then Correction Factor just sorta amps the algorithm up and down.

If you find you have lots of IOB on board when the lows happen, then I:carb setting may be the culprit, or it may just come down to bolus timing.

If you’re having so much trouble with lows and it’s a recent development, if could be that you’ve made changes that make you more sensitive to insulin in general. More active during the summer, dietary changes, weight loss, medication changes, etc… In that case, all 3 settings might need changed!

Control-IQ is the most powerful commercial system, but it’s only as good as it’s settings. I really think it’s best suited for patients who understand how the settings work and/or those who have a medical support team who understands how the settings work, and can make appropriate adjustments. Tandem is working on software that can recommend adjustments, but until that’s released, this nature of the system may be a downside for some. Unfortunately, not all doctors are good with the evolving tech, so there’s definitely an argument for Medtronic and O5 in these cases.

6 Likes

I made the switch two years ago and I’m in love! I’ve fluctuated between 5.7-6.5 depending on life, but my favorite part has been that flatline over night. I rarely have a night where I have to correct! I keep kicking myself for putting up with Medtronic for so long!

Yea!

In order to get CiQ working correctly you need to get your basal rates correct. I suggest thst you fast for a day.
Record the basal rates thst keep you flat lined and use those rates in your settings.

It took me a few months of fooling around before I realized this. My old Medtronic pump settings just weren’t right for my Tandem. Once I got it set up right my sugars are nearly always stable. I still go high once in a while and I still go low but never low enough to cause any issue.
Hopefully you can meet with a dietitian or a pump educator who can get it set up right

Your coefficient of variation number, at 16.4%, is stellar! This is a little appreciated diabetes statistic. It is simply the Standard Deviation divided by the Mean. In your case, it is 18 mg/dL / 109 mg/dL.

Why is variability such an important measure? Most people (doctors included!) look at the downstream measure of % hypoglycemia and never consider the role of glucose variability.

Reduced variability permits safely lowering the blood glucose average or mean without raising the risk of hypos.

This risk reduction is usually built on a judicious eating style that avoids food and meal timing that undermines good control. Your status as T2D is likely a benefit to you in this regard. For comparison, as a T1D, I rarely measure a CofV < 18%. I speculate that you likely enjoy some limited beta cell natural insulin release that I don’t.

I encourage you to see this as a “strong card” in the hand you’ve been dealt.

3 Likes

Enjoy your success! Even though you’re well aware of the shortcomings of the A1c measurement, knowing most clinicians fixation on that number allows you to demonstrate competence in their world. I hope you didn’t have to listen to the almost obligatory warnings about hypo risk based on A1c alone.

I’m encouraged to read about your positive outcome with the Tandem X2 CIQ.

2 Likes

No, I seem to have a good record of lucking into endos (in this case an APRN) who are up on current standards and practices. Doesn’t hurt to live in areas where practices are associated with major research hospitals (last one was with Brigham & Womens in Boston; new one is with Yale-New Haven in CT) She was thrilled, not least b/c she had also helped advise me on the choice when I had to get a new pump this year…

1 Like

Post deleted by author

Post deleted by author

1 Like

Post deleted by author

Thanks, Pstud123, for this advice. Honestly, my SD is 29-30. I think that reflects my inability to “refine my lifestyle” as you say! :blush: Nonetheless my TIR is 93-95% so I don’t feel like a complete failure, and A1Cs run 6.3-6.5. I will only be using the t-slim for another couple of weeks at this point, but I am going to try a couple of your suggestions to see how that goes! I have been using sleep mode 24/7 for several months now and that seems to work better for me that daytime regular CTRL-IQ. Thanks again.

Post deleted by author