I don’t think l’ve ever had one of my posts read so carefully and nitpicked so extensively before. I don’t know whether to be insulted, flattered or to give you an award.
What your response tells me is that:
You don’t understand that the mechanism of subdermal scarring doesn’t depend on who you are , just that you stuck something foreign under your skin, and your body is trying to protect you with a “scab” around it.
You don’t understand that ranting or commiserating in a forum won’t get you any replacement Dexcom sensors.
You don’t know how to make the system work for you and believe it should change to fit you. It won’t. It can’t. It’s optimized to be cost efficient, not customer pleasing but complaint cost controlling.
I wrote automatic and I meant it. Something is automatic whether done by a person or a machine. Whatever you fill out in the form is read by something which follows a predefined procedure. The outcomes are predictable - boilerplate messages with SSR#s inserted. Knee-jerk responses.
Dexcom probably has CSAs tapping confirmation boxes on screens to keep the FDA happy, and more customer service agents are likely to be available at certain times than others. Night shifts, weekends and holidays have generally lower staffing levels, less capable CSAs. The less capable the CSA, the more they need to wait for help from supervisors. Call early in the week on a business day and you increase the chance of a sensor leaving the building you that same day.
“Sensor failed after warmup”, location: abdomen, is the message this system find easiest to process. It produces the simplest message, one which could be sent automatically without human intervention.
The message is:
" Thank you for submitting your self-service request to the Dexcom Technical Support team. Your Dexcom Technical Support Service Request # is:000000-000000. A follow-up from a Technical Support Agent should arrive within 48 hours. In the meantime, please visit the quick answers section of our website at Dexcom G6 CGM Questions & Answers | Dexcom where most common questions have already been answered." etc
If you respond to this, today a CSA must handle it. CSAs get rated on the number of calls they close. All they need to close a failed-after-warmup call is enough detail to quickly convince them that it’s a real problem and matches the category.
So at the top of the reply, I respond with information that confirms my issue in a way that can’t be debated. It takes me 5 minutes to write something like this, working from my Xdrip screens.
" I inserted this sensor shortly after an MRI, on 12/14 at 1415. It was initially very high and erratic when my BG was stable and in the 130s. After a calibration 6 hours later it started to more closely match my BG meter then started oscillating +/-20 mg/dL. At dinner on 1215 at 1830 it was close to my BG meter at 110 mg/dL.
As I was watching TV after dinner, it indicated a less-than-expected rise to 150mg/dL, a slight drop by 2115 to 130 mg/dL, then a rise to 170 at 2145 followed by a sharp drop to 58 mg/dL . My BG meter read 120-130 during this drop and afterward.
This sensor being clearly unreliable, I replaced it at 2215. The new sensor was stable during its first 6 hours. I calibrated it at 0745 and used the calibration value for my morning bolus.
"
I always show the failure and when possible the sequence of what I described. I always get a reply like this within minutes:
" Hello xxxxxx
Thank you for completing the answers on our Web Self-Service Form regarding Inaccurate Readings. We have documented your concern and we will be sending the replacement/s for the following: 1x Sensor
You will receive a confirmation email with tracking information once the replacement has been shipped." etc
The longest I’ve ever waited for a shipping notice with a tracking number was overnight .
My only objective is to get a replacement sensor with the least amount of effort.
Technical CSA (first level support techicians) do not get paid to understand issues or to prevent them from recurring, just to recognize, categorize and validate them.
If I had a problem that could not be fit into one of the named online categories, IF my need wasn’t a replacement sensor AND IF I could benefit from information from a support tech OR I believed that I’d found something important and dangerous to other, then I’d phone them.
But in any other case, I’d do whatever I needed to do to minimize my inconvenience. When that requires checking a few boxes boxes and writing a carefully-phrased paragraph to make it easier for a CSA to decide to press a button, I’ll do it.
That’s a win-win solution that works.