Fair comment and analysis, Terry. To be clear, my criticisms are mild.
I do think, however, she portrays the burdens on a T2 inaccurately. I qualify this with the context of a T2 that is actually actively managing their condition with the goal of minimizing any health impact from it.
This does not describe most diabetics.
So, in my opinion, she puts forth the common misconception that T2 is pretty easy to live with, and that's my point: Sure, if you're not really going to treat it effectively, it's pretty easy.
And that, to me, is the single biggest contrast between T1 and T2 in a practical sense: T1's must treat effectively, or they die. T2's can skate, and just deteriorate over years to decades. However, we mostly wind up with the same health problems.
If you're going to have similar goals to T1's -- and why shouldn't all diabetics? -- of maintaining the best health you can, avoid complications, keep the disease from getting worse, etc., then treating T2 is very intensive, intrusive, burdensome, and on and on.
She gave a very different impression.
Case in point: Which type of diabetic trying to achieve tight control needs to test more? T1 or T2? (yes, it's a trick question :-))